| 
							
							
							
							
							In its written submission to the inquiry, the tax 
							office indicated that most of the submissions it 
							received in response to its draft bitcoin ruling had 
							generally been in favour of treating it as a 
							currency for income tax and GST purposes, and as a 
							financial supply for GST purposes when it is 
							converted to Australian dollars.
						 
							
							
							
							
							"Whether bitcoin or other crypto-currencies should 
							be treated as ‘money’ or ‘currency’ is a question of 
							policy," the ATO said. 
						 
							
							
							
							
							"The committee considers that the most immediate 
							concern for Australian digital currency businesses 
							is the current GST treatment of digital currencies," 
							the Senate inquiry's report states. 
						 
							
							
							
							
							"The committee is of the view that digital currency 
							should be treated as money for the purposes of the 
							goods and services tax," the report argues. 
						 
							
							
							
							
							Evidence from the ATO during the inquiry was that 
							changing the tax treatment of digital currencies 
							would require amendments to both GST legislation and 
							regulations. 
						 
							
							
							
							
							"As such, the committee recommends that the 
							government consults with the states and territories 
							to consider amending the definition of money in the 
							A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 
							and including digital currency in the definition of 
							financial supply in A New Tax System (Goods and 
							Services Tax) Regulations 1999," the report states. 
						 
							
							
							
							
							The current treatment of bitcoin "has placed an 
							additional burden on Australian digital currency 
							businesses," the report argues. 
						 
							
							
							
							
							Bitcoin advocates that appeared at the inquiry's 
							public hearings called for the GST treatment of the 
							currency to be changed. 
						 
							
							
							
							
							Some Australian bitcoin-based businesses have 
							already closed down or relocated overseas, according 
							to the Australian Digital Currency Commerce 
							Association (ADCCA). The report's recommendation 
							flies in the face of arguments made by Treasury 
							officials before the committee. 
						 
							
							
							
							
							Treasury has been monitoring the use of bitcoin in 
							Australia both from a regulatory perspective and a 
							tax perspective. 
							
							
							
							
							"I think we will continue to assess the environment, 
							but I would stress that it is an industry in its 
							infancy, so I think to jump in and suggest that 
							there should be changes to the tax law to 
							accommodate it is a little bit early in that 
							process," Kate Preston, general manager of the 
							Treasury's Small Business Tax Division, said at a 
							hearing of the inquiry earlier this year. 
						 
							
							
							Today's 
							report also recommends further analysis on whether 
							digital currencies such as bitcoin should be as akin 
							to foreign currencies for the purposes of income tax 
							and fringe benefits. "The committee recommends that 
							further examination of appropriate tax treatment of 
							digital currencies should be included in the 
							[federal government's] taxation white paper process, 
							with particular regard to income tax and fringe 
							benefits tax," the report states. In terms of 
							regulation for business involved the digital 
							currency industry, the report noted concerns raised 
							in evidence submitted to the inquiry about the 
							impact that over-regulation could have on the 
							nascent bitcoin sector. 
						 
							
							
							
							
							"As the digital currency industry is still in its 
							early stages, the committee supports a 
							'wait-and-see' approach to government regulation," 
							the report states. 
						 
							
							
							
							
							"The committee believes that the relevant government 
							agencies should closely monitor the development of 
							the digital currency industry in Australia, and 
							conduct further research to determine the actual 
							risks and opportunities presented by different types 
							of digital currency businesses, for example Bitcoin 
							exchanges and ATMs, or payment facilities." 
						 
							
							
							
							
							However, the inquiry did back the Attorney-General's 
							Departments statutory review into Australia's 
							anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism 
							financing laws, which is considering whether digital 
							currency businesses should be part of Australia's 
							AML/CTF regime. 
						 
							
							
							
							
							Australia's anti-money laundering watchdog, AUSTRAC, 
							has examined the potential use of digital currencies 
							in money laundering. Late last year the Australian 
							Crime Commission revealed the existence of an 
							operation to monitor the use of digital currencies, 
							including bitcoin, by criminals. 
						 
							
							
							
							
							Today's report also recommended the government 
							consider setting up a 'Digital Economy Taskforce' in 
							order to "gather further information on the uses, 
							opportunities and risks associated with digital 
							currencies". "This will enable regulators, such as 
							the Reserve Bank of Australia and ASIC, to monitor 
							and determine if and when it may be appropriate to 
							regulate certain digital currency businesses," the 
							report states. 
						 
							
							
							
							
							"In the meantime, the committee supports ADCCA's 
							continued development of a self-regulation model, in 
							consultation with government agencies."
						
						
						
							
						
						
						Source:: 
						The Sydney Morning Herald , dated 04/08/2015. |